Smoking Accessories

www.NicotineCigaretteFilter.com

View Cart    Contact Us    Help/FAQ

Home > Useful Information > About Smoking > Second Hand Smoke Passive smoking > Epidemiological studies of passive smoking

Site Map

  Categories
Cigarette Filters
10 Packs (100 Filters)
36 Packs (360 Filters)
72 Packs (720 Filters)
Lighters
Jet Line Pocket Torch
Jet Line Z-Torch
Tiger
Blazer
Lucienne
Swarovski
Lighter Refill & Care Instructions
Services
Contact Us
Help / FAQ
Useful Information
Submit your site
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Second Hand Smoke Epidemiological studies of passive smoking

 
Epidemiological studies show that non-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke are at risk for many of the health problems associated with direct smoking.

In 1992, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a review of the available evidence regarding the relationship between secondhand smoke and heart disease, and estimated that passive smoking was responsible for 35,000 to 40,000 deaths per year in the United States in the early 1980s. Some studies find that non-smokers living with smokers have about a 25% increase in risk of death from heart attack, are more likely to suffer a stroke, and can sometimes contract genital cancer. Some research, with better measures of secondhand smoke exposure suggests that risks to nonsmokers may be even greater than this estimate. A British study reported that exposure to secondhand smoke increases the risk of heart disease among non-smokers by as much as 60%, similar to light smoking.

Parental smoking can affect children and babies, and is associated with low birth weight, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), bronchitis and pneumonia, and middle ear infections.

In 2002, a group of 29 experts from 12 countries convened by the Monographs Programme of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) reviewed all significant published evidence related to tobacco smoking and cancer. It concluded:

These meta-analyses show that there is a statistically significant and consistent association between lung cancer risk in spouses of smokers and exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke from the spouse who smokes. The excess risk is of the order of 20% for women and 30% for men and remains after controlling for some potential sources of bias and confounding.

Subsequent meta-analyses have confirmed these findings, and additional studies have found that high overall exposure to passive smoke even among people with non-smoking partners is associated with greater risks than partner smoking and is widespread in non-smokers.

The National Asthma Council of Australia cites studies showing that environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is probably the most important indoor pollutant, especially around young children:

Smoking by either parent, particularly by the mother, increases the risk of asthma in children.
The outlook for early childhood asthma is less favourable in smoking households.
Children with asthma who are exposed to smoking in the home generally have more severe disease.
Many adults with asthma identify ETS as a trigger for their symptoms.
Doctor-diagnosed asthma is more common among non-smoking adults exposed to ETS than those not exposed. Among people with asthma, higher ETS exposure is associated with a greater risk of severe attacks.
In France passive smoking has been estimated to cause between 3,000 and 5,000 premature deaths per year, with the larger figure cited by Prime minister Dominique de Villepin during his announcement of a nationwide smoking ban: "That makes more than 13 deaths a day. It is an unacceptable reality in our country in terms of public health.

Epidemiological studies of passive smoking Studies in animals >>

Second Hand Smoke Passive smoking

Long-term effects

Short-term effects

Causal mechanisms

Epidemiological studies of passive smoking
1. Studies of passive smoking in animals
2. Risk level of passive smoking

Current state of scientific opinion
1. Public opinion

Controversy over harms of passive smoking
1. Critique of individual studies and epidemiology
2. World Health Organization controversy
3. EPA lawsuit
4. Tobacco-industry funding of research

Tobacco industry response
1. Position of major tobacco companies
 

 

Information obtained from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
All text is available under the terms of the
GNU Free Documentation License.

 

Copyright © 2008 NicotineCigaretteFilter.com All rights reserved.